Mark Shuttleworth, Interviewed!
Mark Shuttleworth was gracious enough to give me a few minutes of his time.
In other news, my quest to discover what people are doing to change the world has it’s own website, change.peat.org!
Mark Shuttleworth was gracious enough to give me a few minutes of his time.
In other news, my quest to discover what people are doing to change the world has it’s own website, change.peat.org!
Mark Shuttleworth is in Portland and will be giving a talk at the Mission Theater tonight — I’m totally pumped about it, and you should be to. Why?
Mark founded and manages the Ubuntu Foundation, which aims to produce a high quality desktop and server operating system that is freely available all over the world.
Translation: he created one of the most successful Linux projects out there, with the aim to make computers easier to use, cheaper to buy, and more accessible to the rest of the world.
Mark also formed HBD Venture Capital, a business incubator and venture capital provider and Canonical Ltd., for the promotion and commercial support of free software projects … In 2001 he formed the Shuttleworth Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to social innovation which also funds educational and free and open source software projects in South Africa.
Translation: Mark puts his money where his mouth is, and is investing in other businesses that increase the adoption and awareness of open source software.
He’s also a cosmonaut. How cool is that?
“What are you doing to change the world today?”
I’ve asked this question on Twitter almost every morning for the last couple of weeks, and I’ve received some pretty cool answers from artists, coders, lawyers, entrepreneurs, and the like. I’ve had a good response, so I want to cast the net a little wider.
As an experiment, I’m going to interview a few more people over the next couple of weeks, and share their responses here.
Want to contribute? Want to be interviewed? Know someone who you’d like to be interviewed? Leave me a note and we’ll get things figured out!
Holy crap. Every week there’s a miniature gold rush when a new microblogging site is released. Twitter proved the market, and the concept is so simple that anyone with an elementary web development education can put up their own site. And, apparently they are.
So, Twitter kicked the whole thing off, and it’s a compelling system because it’s incredibly simple, and very accessible (web, IM, widgets, SMS, etc). It’s also pretty flakey right now. More on that later.
Immediately after Twitter’s user base “hockey sticked,” Pownce and Jaiku jumped on the scene, with a couple extra features, like pulling in photos from Flickr and whatnot. [ed: turns out Jaiku launched a few months before Twitter, my bad]
FriendFeed joined the fray at around the same time, adding a veritable raft load of ways to track and comment on posts from other sites.
Then Plurk leaped into battle with it’s headless Doglephant and wildly different user interface, provoking Love It or Hate It responses from everyone who tried it. They don’t pull in other content, but they do allow discussions to grow around specific messages, and they added the concept of karma — more participation means more karma, and extra little toys to play with.
This week, Identi.ca showed up with a back to basics story, and a twist. It’s pretty much just like Twitter, and people want to give it a shot because it seems to be more reliable (more on that later). The twist is basically a marketing move: the software that powers the Identi.ca site is an open source project, so anyone with software chops can use it to create their own micro-blogging community. Heads up, internal communications people.
Now, regarding reliability. A slightly flakey experience is not a big enough factor to drive away the masses. None of the above sites are Twitter killers, because Twitter has a critical mass of users who have shown that even if Twitter is unreliable, they’ll stick it out to stay in touch with their friends. Will it frustrate early adopters with short attention spans, and rabid interaction habits? Sure. Will they totally abandon Twitter? Not likely.
My prediction? Twitter is going to stay king of the microblogging universe for the next few years, and that universe is going to get much, much bigger. Like Gary Vaynerchuk said on his swing through Portland — “You think there’s a lot of people using Twitter now? Wait until Oprah gets on Twitter.” Hopefully, the fine folks at Twitter are planning for such an event.
I expect that we short attention span, early adopter types are going to stick with Twitter, but spend most of our time on FriendFeed. Why? Because it’s such a powerful aggregator. We’ll continue to sign up for any social web app that shows up on the radar, and we’ll use FriendFeed to track and manage all of our discussions.
[update: The Wife just knocked on my office door and informed me that the buyer backed out moments before they sealed the deal. Sigh. We're following up on other offers, but if there's anyone out there in Internet land who wants a kick ass car, ping me immediately!]
We sold our little red Mini Cooper today. It was a bittersweet transaction, but it was the right thing to do — the baby seat doesn’t fit in the back seat, and having insurance and car payments on two cars just isn’t worth while for a family with no commuters.
That said, practicality can’t substitute for personality, which the Mini has in spades. It’s small. It’s cute. It’s red. It’s zippy, and it has big “52″ stickers on the doors (I still haven’t figured out why). Little kids point and yell “race car!” when it drives by.
We’ve been Mini nuts since we bought our first in 2003 (a silver Mini One), so I suspect we’ll pick up another when we move beyond baby seats and our boring family sedan gives up the ghost. Maybe a Clubman. Maybe there’s a hybrid in the future?
Here’s to you, 52!
A couple of months ago a segment on Good Eats caught my attention: jonnycakes, AKA hoecakes, AKA cornmeal pancakes. I love pancakes, but I’m also a grumpy klutz on weekday mornings, which rules out my (somewhat labor intensive) favorite pancake recipe.
Fortunately, jonnycakes are simple enough to handle in the throes of Morning Brain, plus they’re delicious, fast, and cheap. That’s a hard combination to beat.
I jiggered Alton’s recipe a little bit to reduce the number of implements requiring cleaning:
First, put a skillet on the stove at medium heat. We’ll let that warm up while prepping the batter.
Scoop cornmeal into a small mixing bowl with a 1/3rd cup measuring cup (more on that later), add the salt and baking powder, and plop in the butter. Mix in a bit of boiling water.
The heat is important! Cornmeal is terrified of cold water, and we also want to melt the butter. How much water? Enough so that your batter is still clumpy and doesn’t run smooth. This seems to vary depending on your cornmeal … sorry I can’t be more specific!
Mix in the egg, and check the consistency with your measuring cup. Our goal is to be just wet enough so that it pours without clumping. Still clumpy? Add more water. Too runny? Add more cornmeal.
Now you’re ready to rock.
Oh yeah, about that measuring cup — 1/3rd cup of batter produces six perfect sized specimens with this recipe. And it means I only have to wash one measuring cup. Hah.
Alrighty. Pour some batter on the skillet. It should be hot enough to sizzle as soon as it hits the surface. Your milage will vary, but two minutes per side on medium heat gives me a golden brown and airy jonnycake.
Serve with fresh fruit, honey, maple syrup, or whatever floats your boat. Almost anything you put on your jonnycakes will cost more than what went in to ‘em. The ingredients clock in under $1 even if you’re buying local + organic.
Cheaper than Pop Tarts, and way better for ya.
Try it out, tell me what you think.
What are you doing tonight?
Want to watch some kick ass presentations about weird and interesting things?
Do you enjoy beer?
Do you think free is a (very) good price?
Than Ignite Portland is the event for you, and tonight is the night to get your rear to the Bagdad Theater. The doors open at 5:30, but get there early — last time we hit capacity and had to turn away a few hundred people, and this time around the early bird tickets were all nabbed within 24 hours.
I’m part of the volunteer team, so I’ll helping out with whatever needs help.
If you see me, feel free to say hello!
Estimates for software are terrible, terrible things. When I was a budding web developer, I thought I had it pretty much figured out: X hours to solve the stated problem, X hours to write the code and tests, then double the sum (aka, “the optimistic compensation adjustment”).
That worked alright when my job was just writing code, but utterly failed when I struck out on my own. Aside from figuring out how to budget for planning, communication, integration, and deployment … I also realized that I brought a huge number of technical assumptions to the table, and that my assumptions weren’t always in line with what the customer needed.
So, over the last several years I’ve compiled a set of questions that help me better understand the general technical requirements for a project. It isn’t comprehensive or complete — you can’t fill out the form, pull a lever, and have an estimate shoot out — but it is a good starting point, and has helped me quickly figure out a the client’s expectations and experience with building web applications.
Chances are you’ll have to put on your expert hat and coach your clients through some of these questions (and their implications) … but that’s what they’re paying you for, right?
So, without further ado …
Anyone have other things to contribute?
I have a problem. I’m totally overwhelmed when I go into music stores. As soon as I walk through the door, I immediately forget all of the music I was excited about, then I burn out after ten minutes of flipping through the racks.
Never the less, I like owning physical media (and having control over how it’s ripped into my music collection), and used CDs are a heck of a deal these days.
So, a few weeks ago I started planning. I put together a list of albums that were only partially represented in my collection, or were low quality rips … then I called my buddy Tom.
Tom is “that guy.” You know — the kid in elementary school who was listening to Fugazi and Suicidal Tendencies when the rest of us were discovering Michael Jackson. He was the kid in high school who actually had opinions about bass players and producers, and could produce lyrics from a discography of thousands of songs without a moment’s hesitation. He’s been in (or worked with) bands for as long as he’s been able to pick up drum sticks (or a guitar, or a keyboard). His room was (and is) piled with crates of vinyl, stacks of CDs, a wild assortment of instruments, and various musical paraphernalia.
Anyhow, I gave Tom a mission: help me find new music, and start developing a sonic curricula for Mr. E.
We walked out of Everyday Music with 30 albums. It’s all good, but there are a few stand outs. In no particular order …
The Geraldine Fibbers, “Lost Somewhere Between The Earth And My Home” – Post-rock meets punk meets country? Holy crap, it works. I don’t track lyrics very well, but Carla Bozulich’s voice is amazing. Circa 1995.
Jamie Lidell, “Multiply” – Stunning vocals, great production, a healthy twist of modern electronic and DJ dojiggery. If you like the sound of Gnarls Barkley, old Stevie Wonder, and … well … if you like music, you’ll probably like this.
Yann Tiersen, “Amelie” – The sound track to Amelie is one of my favorite aspects of the movie. It’s quirky, happy, playful music.
Unkle, “War Stories” – I think Unkle is one of the best collaborative groups of all time. ”Burn My Shadow” with Ian Astbury is particularly haunting song, and has a killer video.
They Might Be Giants, “Here Come the ABCs” – It’s the ABCs in a form I can get down to. I sure hope Mr. E appreciates it.
Yo-Yo Ma, “The Cello Suites” – I love the cello, so I guess this one is a bit of a shoe-in. Wonderful stuff.
There’s a pile more to dig through. I’m a happy camper.
Any recommendations you’d like to make?
Plurk is the only Twitter alternative I’m excited about. Why? Because the interface is fun to navigate, gives a better sense of time and community, and has plenty of visual queues for it’s features … and the people who are building it are obviously having a lot of fun. Their logo is a headless doglephant, and they call themselves the A-Team. Never underestimate the power of fun.
They say it’s built to scale, but we’ll see. Their growth chart this week looks like an insane hockey stick, but I suspect they’re still under 10k users. My fingers are crossed. I’d love to see these guys succeed.
In the meantime, you’re welcome to Plurk me.
peat dot org is powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).